In this article, we explore the ways in which addressing emotions in writing center work has been discussed and then look specifically at how using Carl Rogers’ (1951) empathic listening and responding approach can support the inclusion of emotions in writing consultations as a way to lead into our study examining and applying empathic listening at our writing center. But there are still tools within psychology that can be used to acknowledge the cognitive and emotive elements of students in writing centers in ways that are supportive of them as people first and writers second. Additionally, writing centers cannot provide the tools, training, and certifications to prepare peer-writing consultants to address all the emotional needs of all students. If they attempt to act as such, they make themselves and the students with which they interact vulnerable in ways that may not be healthy. Certainly, consultants are not counselors. The question for writing centers is to what extent should we address the affective elements inherent in writing center work. Seeing students as emotional beings, acknowledging that academia cannot be an “emotion-free zone,” is important. For many years, our scholarship has leaned toward cognitive discussions (Agostinelli, Poch, Santoro, 2000), and even recent reviews of writing center literature still reveal a concentration on cognitive skills and the negative impact of emotions (Lawson, 2015). In tutor training manuals, many of the suggestions regarding working with emotional students set up a cautious position for the tutor (Lape, 2008). Writing center scholarship has examples of addressing emotive concerns and includes discussions about therapeutic approaches. Since writing centers are embedded in the larger institutional culture, the emphasis on cognitive concerns impacts our work. This emphasis on the cognitive aspects of writing can make higher education seem like an “emotion-free zone” (Mortiboys, 2011), but this is not always in students’ best interests. Key words: Rogers, empathic listening, empathic responding, empathy, survey research, observation, trainingĮven with data about emotional impacts in college, such as the 2016 annual report from The Center for Collegiate Mental Health (Pennsylvania State University) listing anxiety as the most commonly reported issue (61%), there is a tendency in higher education to downplay emotions and the correlations of attending (or not) to affective dimensions and student success (Beard, Clegg, & Smith, 2007 Morin-Major et al., 2016). Using survey research and analysis of observations, the training consultants in Rogerian strategies was determined to be an effective approach. This article examines the role of emotions in writing center consultations, specifically the use of Carl Rogers’ (1951) empathic listening and responding strategies as a way to acknowledge and engage students’ emotions during writing support.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |